Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Najib: Truth is on my side as Allah is my witness!

Najib.


In the name of Allah Almighty I swear I have never met or ever known the dead girl Altantuya. All the allegations made against me, and my wife, were meant to destroy my family and to tarnish my image as a leader, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said recently to Agenda Daily, an influential news portal. Read more here...

He said he is not afraid to face these allegations since he knows he is innocent and that truth will eventually prevail.

"Allah almighty will decide on the real truth and allegations hurled at me, and my wife, in due time.Those who throw allegations at me and my wife will get his final judgment in the hereafter. But who knows if they are not careful they may get the judgment sooner than later now when they are still around," he said.

P.S. Come to think of it Brother Anwar Bin Ibrahim has never invoke the name of Allah or swear in the name of Allah to ensure he is innocent of sodomy charges! May be it is true he did it, if you ask me, as a Malaysian seeking an answer!

Cheers!


*news update*

Meanwhile Brother Anwar Bin Ibrahim's accuser Saiful dared him to swear in the name of Allah Almighty that he did not sodomise him. It was reported in the NST read below:-


KUALA LUMPUR: Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan lashed out yesterday against Parti Keadilan Rakyat de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

In a posting on his Friendster social networking web-site page yesterday, Saiful issued a challenge to Anwar to swear on the Quran if he was not guilty (of sodomy).

In a police report lodged on June 28, Saiful had accused Anwar of sodomising him.

In the posting, Saiful said the righteous would stand while the wicked would fall.

Saiful was referring to Perlis Mufti Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin's suggestion that the sodomy allegation against Anwar be solved through a mubahalah.
Mubahalah is an old Islamic practice where the disputing parties would swear on the Quran that they were telling the truth and pray that God's curse would befall the lying party.

Last week, Mohd Asri said that Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat, who is also Kelantan Menteri Besar, was suited to be the mediator, due to his huge influence in Islamic society.

Nik Aziz had supported Mohd Asri's proposal while Perak Mufti Datuk Seri Harussani Zakaria had also lent support to the suggestion.

When contacted for a response, Anwar refused comment.

However, at the opposition-organised protest against rising oil prices held at the Kelana Jaya Stadium on Sunday, Anwar said the Quran was not a tool that should be politicised.

"Don't play with this issue. If you want to follow the Islamic method, take me to the syariah court.

"Then if they want me to swear on it, I'll do it," he had said.

This was the first time Saiful has broken his silence after lodging a report against Anwar on June 28.

Police have classified the case as carnal intercourse against the order of nature without consent, an offence which carries a jail sentence of between five and 20 years, with whipping.
Read more here....


Cheers good people of Malaysia!!

16 comments:

straycat's strut said...

Pasquale, come to think of it, I dont believe swearing in the name of Allah will establish anything.

I am not trying to imply anything but its just that I was wondering if these people are God-fearing. If you can sodomize, what is "bersumpah" to them? Even Mona Fendy can 'bersumpah" that she never killed anyone. Then what? Set her free?

I agree with Nik Aziz. Let the law take its course first.

And honestly, I am having a hard time believing Anwar with or without sumpah.

Revisited said...

Who knows..I'd like to think that these are all God-fearing man and that when they invoke the name it's because they are not afraid of standing before God and testify.

idzan ismail said...

Dear Magpie.

Touche. Not a word. Today he went to Syariah Court to fix Saiful. He knows he can't get away in the civil courts or swear in the name of Allah as proposed. It's impossible to get four witnesses as required by Syariah law. The act is between two people. It's your word against mine. Halleluiah Saiful. Look at Anwar's body language at Jakim. Wonder he's wearing a life-vest?. Is he in the streets of Baghdad or Tel Aviv. Such paranoia, such pomposity. Who wants to kill him? A spent force. Even our beloved Dr M whom detractors call dictator can go to Kinokuniya or The Loaf safely. On the otherhand, if you do wrong you gotta take prevention. Every life he touches he brought ruination. Even Bala is infected by this disease - escape. Then blame other people. My sympathy to his family who have to defend him right or wrong.

Anonymous said...

dulu nik aziz kata tun mahathir diktator sebab taknak letak jawatan. dah 8 tahun tun letak jawatan... nik aziz kekal lagi jadi MB kelantan.. kerusi tu lembut sangat agaknya..

dulu berjuta rakyat malaysia cakap tun mahathir mahazalim dan gila kuasa sebab pecat anwar ibrahim.. kata konspirasi macam2.. macam anwar ni mulia tahap nabi. sedangkn tun mahathir duk sakit kepala tak tidur malam duk pk nak setelkan masalah krisis kewangan nak pastikan rakyat malaysia cukup makan, cukup pakai dan cukup segalanya.. masa tu anwar pi cakap kat semua orang dalam dunia ni mahathir ni jahat, kejam, zalim, tak islamik.. dan 5 tahun tun letak jawatan... liwat sama jugak keluar..

kesimpulan; berjuta orang rakyat malaysia berdosa kat mahathir sebab anwar dan nik aziz. semoga tuhan balas segalanya. ini doa orang yang bersyukur.

samad sen

wisdomthinker said...

Hello magpie,

I doubt if these politician is fearing-God person. They are good in dealing with issues as they are outspoken and influence crowds.

However, eventually the wise person will always find a way to be free from the charges accused to him.

The combination of Laws of public opinion and the laws of court trial should enable the guilty person be punish for his acts.

I'm no power in deciding who's the liar or vice versa, but I'm giving my best judgment based on my best knowledge regarding the issues.

Anonymous said...

Magpie/Pasquale,

Just to let you know my entire extended family in Tanjung Tualang, about 120 of them now believe Anwar Ibrahim is guilty of sodomy. I am a graduate of UM and working as an analyst with a broking firm and my accountant wife for the last 12 years is a Malay from Johor and her extended family also believe the same.
We just want the country to get back on the right track and not to allow it to be turned into an oligarch where Pak Lah and his family and crony to rule. I am a fourth generations Malaysian and my family live in this country namely Tanjung Tualang since time immemorial we want to keep on doing it and not allow to see it broken in pieces! Terima Kasih!
Najib is fine with us by the way!

The Chye's

Anonymous said...

Pasquale,

We have a group that can read faces we sat down by the roadside cafe or a restaurant and we will have fun reading faces. What we think is Anwar Ibrahim has an evil looks compared to Najib. Anwar Ibrahim, we believe, has a flair to be cruel and he will not feel a thing no remorse, at least that s what his face indicates, meanwhile Najib has a caring face, we go for Najib anytime!

Laylon Group.

lekiu said...

Straycut,

I agree. I hate it when the Good book is dragged into this sordid episode.

malaysianlover said...

To Bro Anwar Bin Ibrahim & his followers,
Calling other people "wrong" does not make you "right".

Anonymous said...

Pasquale,
Here's a catch isn't it, where can we find four people witnessing and actually saw Anwar Ibrahim buggering this Saiful,if there were only two of them? How about a lie detector test then the FBI can help us with their sure-proof uncontaminated equipment?! Just a thought.

Chicken Presto.

Jeffri said...

Sekurang-kurangnya Najib buat apa yang sepatutnya untuk membuktikan dirinya tak bersalah.. Sekurang-kurangnya beliau tak berdolak dalik dan tak ego..tak seperti Anwar yang sampai sekarang tak pernah terdengar dari mulutnya bersumpah dengan nama ALLAH yang dia tak melakukan segala tuduhan atasnya..

Anonymous said...

Magpie/Pasquale!

Perkara kes Anwar ke mahkamah syariah.
Elok kalau dapat kita renung dan menyoalkan kemungkinan mengapa Anwar ke Mahkamah Syariah
1)Apakah Anwar pergi ke mahkamah syariah kerana beliau ikhlas kerana ingin memartabatkan agama Islam atau ingin menyelamat kan diri ?
2)Kenapa tergesa-gesa pergi ke mahkamah syariah sedangkan laporan polis belum selesai?
Anwar dah jelas desperate. Kawan2 beliau dalam PKR dan PAS dah mulai sangsi dengan beliau. Semasa beliau ke mahkamah syariah tak ramai kawan2 yang ikut mengeringgi beliau walaupun sebelum itu kempen melalui sms suruh ramai2 berkumpul dimasjid negara..Anwar nampak nya jelas kecewa...

Penanam Limauy Manis!

al bujuri said...

BABI tu sebenarnya pengecut, cakap je banyak, tapi hasilnya takda.. Dia bukan nak bersumpah pun, dia bagi je macam2 alasan kononnya dia tak payah bersumpah sebenarnya..

Jeffri said...

Betul la..Nampak sangat macam Anwar terdesak sekarang ni. Mungkin sebab takut kehilangan orang kuat dan penyokong2 setia lagi taksub tu. Masa beliau ke Pejabat Agama pun tak ramai yang ramai pengikut beliau yang mengiringi sedangkan sebelum ni kata ada orang nak bunuh dia lah,ape lah sampai lari ke Kedutaan Turki.. Desperate Anwar...

jebatmustdie said...

Sir,

I may not be an expert in religious matter, but I would like to bring everyone to this piece of 'ayat' in surah an-nur regarding the 4 witness thingy ;

“dan orang-orang yang MELEMPARKAN TUDUHAN ZINA kepada perempuan-perempuan yang terpelihara kehormatannya, kemudian mereka tidak membawa empat orang saksi. Maka sebatlah mereka 80 kali sebat, dan janganlah kamu terima persaksian mereka itu selama-lamanya kerana mereka itu adalah orang yang fasiq”

But this ayat had been the subject to several interpretations. And this is where lies the conflict of interests. Note here that the requirement to bring 4 witnesses (must be male and with impeccable personality with really high moral values) is only be subjected to IF YOU WANT TO ACCUSE SOMEBODY of committing adultery.

But if the victims themselves is reporting this sin/crime, then there is no need for it. That was my limited understanding on this rule (which extraodinarily, being concurred with several muftis).

Therefore, Saiful does not have to bring any witnesses as he was the alleged victim. Once again, Anwar is playing up to the gallery while his PAS cronies validating the ayat just to suit their needs.

But if I'm wrong in this, then I am sorry.

Jeffri said...

Dengar cerita, PKR nak buat undi tidak percaya terhadap pimpinan Pak Lah dalam Parlimen petang ni, macam yang SAPP buat hari tu.. ada2 je la PKR ni..Macam nak tutup cerita isu liwat Anwar je..I guest...