Saturday, May 04, 2013

Healthy Skepticism: Anwar’s politicisation of ‘fraud’!

 
Ptenisnet is like Brother Anwar Bin Ibrahim in many ways!
He can find a new career as a porn star!
Majority of his very close PKR friends have left him!  Go figure!
A consumate Fraudster! Yeah!

I came across this must-read interesting article written by a Malaysian-based foreign journalist on how he described Brother Anwar Bin Ibrahim's (BABI) ability to politicise everything and anything under the sun.BABI reminds me of this tiny little character in my favourite cartoon comic books "Obelix and Asterix".  

This little pathetic Egyptian character in this comic book (Ptenisnet if I am not mistaken) is a sorry looking guy who became the Gauls' secret weapon.  Just place him in a Roman camp for a day rest assured  the Romans will kill each other due to lies he spread, this character has the ability to turn wild boars into political animal (no pun intended!) just by his silly and stupid antics and convincing ranting!! Ptenisnet was never in touch with his reality!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Healthy Skepticism: Anwar’s politicization of ‘fraud’

Saturday, 4 May 2013


By Nile Bowie

There is no doubt that social-media commentators will not take kindly to the message of this article. Regardless of our political persuasions, those in the electorate should not abandon objectivity when assessing the claims of political orators on both sides of the divide. According to recent polling evaluations conducted by the Merdeka Center, the country is nearly spilt down the middle with respect to May 5th’s decision; the result is too close to call for anyone to make a definitive conclusion. Therefore, some would call Anwar Ibrahim’s recent assertion that only 'massive fraud' would prevent his victory, to be deeply disingenuous and politically irresponsible. This statement presupposes that any election result that yields anything other than Anwar’s victory is: invalid, illegitimate, and fraud. This and other statements made by the opposition leader alienate anyone who votes for Barisan Nasional (nearly half the country, according to independent polls).

For a man who has spoken at length to foreign press about turning Malaysian into a ‘mature democracy’, such a scathing statement utterly fails to communicate these aspirations by demonstrating his willingness to politicize hearsay and disregard polls that claim Barisan has about the same level of support that he enjoys. Anwar and the Pakatan have built their campaign upon the perception that the electoral system is rigged in favor of the incumbent, and in doing that, speculation on opposition news portals has become unquestionable truth for many who get their news through social media. Momentary hysteria ensued following recent allegations that the Electoral Commissions’ indelible ink can be washed off, which was used allege that BN would cheat its way into power by allowing people to submit multiple ballots. This was shortly after debunked by the EC in front of reporters, proving that the indelible ink could not be removed from ones finger despite washing several times using various chemicals and solutions.

Allegations that the Prime Minister’s office was involved in ferrying some forty thousand foreigners to vote on behalf of BN are unsubstantiated and logistically unsound. Bloggers have pointed out several mathematic discrepancies, and that the feat of transporting such a large volume of individuals could not possibly be accomplished with the alleged flights that took place. For all the incompetence credited to the Barisan by the opposition, it is the stuff of tabloids to believe that Malaysian intelligence agents could have recruited forty thousand foreign nationals without such a story leaking months ago, as any scheme would have long been in the making. There are far less obtrusive ways of cheating, and for the BN to attempt such a stunt in the fallout of Project IC is highly implausible. There is no doubt that these allegations should be investigated and the authorities concerned must provide more details to vindicate themselves; however, the opposition leader should have come forward with irrefutable evidence when he initially made the claim before politicizing the (so far unsubstantiated) allegations. Needless to say, if any allegations of fraud are substantiated with evidence, the responsible individual or party must be held accountable.

Skepticism of the opposition leader’s words are held by anyone who is familiar with his history. Anwar’s former allies, including founding members of Parti Keadilan Rakyat who defected, speak in unison when they claim that the opposition leader possess gifted political and communication skills, though many of these individuals cite Anwar’s privy to manipulation, his narcissism and his involvement in money politics and cronyism. Ian Stewart, in his book ‘The Mahathir Legacy: A Nation Divided, a Region at Risk’, writes, “While Anwar’s followers --- as witnessed by myself and other journalists --- were handing out packets of money to acquire the support of UMNO division leaders in his 1993 campaign against Ghafar Baba, Anwar himself was winning over influential people in the party by promising positions in the administration he would form when he took over from Dr. Mahathir.” The goal of a politician is realizing political power. It is imperative that the electorate remains skeptical of allegations from both coalitions.

In this battle of perceptions, the opposition leader has worked tirelessly to create distrust of the electoral process in the minds of voters, and with rhetoric that negates the legitimacy of anything but his own victory, Anwar has set the stage for street protests and political unrest should he loose the election. If the opposition leader cannot wrest power legitimately, the TV cameras of international media will provide ample coverage of Anwar’s plight. Footage of tear gas, water cannons, and any ensuing crackdown would dilute the credibility of a Barisan government, even if it were democratically elected without irregularities. Would that be fair to the hypothetical fifty-one percent of BN voters in such a scenario? Both coalitions are guilty of employing propaganda tactics, and Malaysian voters should remain objective and critical of any politician alleging mass scandals at politically opportune moments.

Nile Bowie is a Malaysia-based political analyst and a columnist with Russia Today. He also contributes to PressTV, Global Research, and CounterPunch. He can be reached at nilebowie@gmail.com.

4 comments:

ChineseVotersfromSingapore said...

One million communist chinese amassed across the causeway to Singapore could be the explanation of the huge chinese crowd to Lim Kit Siang ceramah.

Where did these chinese come from and why the need to speak in mandarin only? The PAP Chinese Govt of Singapore is the same as the DAP Chinese in Malaysia.

They have plotted this over 5 years when Lee Kuan Yew came over after rthe 2008 election. This conspiracy is more credible and there are the 2 millions chinese and Indian migrants in Singapore today which are not like the imaginary bangladesh.

The claim of imaginary voters of BN are to divert the huge chinese crossing the causeway. Just 10% of these communist chinese would have a great impact. And with Singapore technology, the production of mykad should be kacang putih.

Crossing the 1 km causeway into Gelang Patah is logistically simple. The Red Army of China is across the causeway my brothers in arms.

Anonymous said...

Yahudi ke, Nile Bowie ni?

Mikey said...

Anwar Ibrahim is undeniably 'ASS HOLE' or 'HOLE ASSES' person.!!!!

Anonymous said...

Who cares if Nile Bowie is Jews or not. The Malays should have no animosity with the Jews. We are no Arabs. Keep the Jews out of Malaysian politics. Only the Zionist is the enemy to Arabs and the world, when they start meddling into other peoples' affairs.

RD.